top of page

The $4.2 Trillion Blindspot: Why Smart Businesses Are Pricing Water

While boards focus on carbon, a new Capgemini–World Climate Foundation report reveals why market leaders are pricing water at 11x the utility rate to secure a competitive edge.


A water reservoir

Today, only 5% of companies price water risk into decision-making, even as trillions in enterprise value depend on it. As we move from an era of setting global targets to implementing them, World Climate Foundation and Capgemini have collaborated to produce an analytical report, The Innovation Wave: Why Smart Businesses Are Investing in Water Resilience, showing how leading firms are responding through data, finance, and operational control. 



For the past decade, carbon has dominated boardroom attention — and rightly so. But that focus has left a critical exposure largely unmanaged. 


Water, a local and operationally decisive input, is now one of the most systematically mispriced risks in the global economy. Companies that continue to treat it as a low-cost utility are making capital decisions based on incomplete information. A small group of early movers is not. 


New analysis in The Innovation Wave shows that while most boardrooms still view water as an operating cost, the top 5% of companies are treating it as a strategic constraint — using risk-adjusted pricing, digital tools, and finance to protect margins and maintain operational continuity. 


"CEOs need to ask: 'Is my competitor securing their water access while I rely on a drying municipal supply?' The companies profiled in this report aren't just saving water; they are future-proofing their margins."

Jens Nielsen, CEO of World Climate Foundation

 


The $4.2 Trillion Blind Spot 


By 2050, around one-third of global GDP (approximately US$70 trillion) will be generated in regions facing high water stress. Yet in most markets, water still appears cheap on the P&L, reflecting delivery costs rather than scarcity, shutdown risk, or loss of access. That mispricing delays resilience upgrades — and when climate shocks hit, production stops. 


Data modelling cited in the report shows that manufacturing and distribution alone face more than US$4.2 trillion in potential GDP losses by 2050 as droughts and floods disrupt cooling, mixing, and processing. 


When water becomes constrained, the financial risk is not the water bill. It is the entire revenue stream of output that cannot be produced. Companies are already being forced into emergency mitigation — trucking in water at 10–20× standard tariffs, fracturing supply chains and erasing margins in real-time. 


GDP loss by sector from GHD Aquanomics - cited in water report by Capgemini and World Climate Foundation

"For most businesses, water used to be considered just another a low-cost operational input – with water scarcity now projected to be impacting one-third of the global economy by 2050, water is now a strategic constraint. The companies that are not evolving the way they view water are heading into a future of potential disruption. Those treating water strategically, often through digital modelling and pricing, are building a platform for structural competitive advantage."

James Robey, Global Head of Environmental Sustainability at Capgemini



Your Competitors Are Already Moving


The cost of inaction is projected to be 5 times higher than the cost of taking action today. Leading firms across every sector are noticing and responding:


  • Tech & Data Centres: When Ecolab assessed a Microsoft data centre in Texas, the risk-adjusted price of water proved 11× higher than the utility tariff. Once recognised internally, Microsoft invested in non-potable cooling systems, saving US$140,000 annually and avoiding nearly 60 million gallons of potable water use. OVHcloud now treats water availability as a hard constraint in data-centre siting, turning efficiency into a licence to operate.


  • Construction & Infrastructure: Eiffage uses digital twins to manage water constraints alongside cost and schedule, reducing delay risks on major projects.


  • Food & Bev: Groupe Bel uses sensors to automate “clean-enough” cycles, cutting water use without slowing production speed.


  • Corporate Finance: The market for Blue Finance (funding dedicated to water resilience) grew from US$1 billion in 2022 to US$6.4 billion in 2023. Companies with investment-grade water data can access this capital at lower cost; those without it face rising risk premiums.



What’s Next for Global Leaders?


The leaders moving now are not waiting for regulation.

They are pricing the risk, protecting revenue, and lowering their cost of capital — while everyone else is still looking at the water bill.



bottom of page